How bad is sexism in newsrooms?

News conference at The Age.

News conference at The Age.

Take a look at any journalism lecture in Australia, and chances are you’ll find that female students tend to dominate the class – at least in numbers. But a strange thing happens once you step outside the classroom. For intrepid students, the penny often drops in a newsroom internship – where, like a 3D Infographic, they first witness the astounding flip in the gender split.

It’s a sobering moment for many. And not just because of the cut-throat competition for a paid job at the end of their degrees.  For the first time, these aspiring female reporters will also get a taste of the kind of news stories they’re likely to be assigned (often lifestyle, ‘colour’ pieces); and  what it’s like to pitch a story in front of a testosterone charged audience, wondering whether anyone would take their ideas seriously.

While it’s easy to dismiss these as rookie concerns, statistics paint a different reality.  A new study – the first of its kind in 16 years – surveyed 577 female journalists across all media platforms in Australia and found that there is still widespread gender discrimination in our newsrooms.

The report builds on earlier findings from the Media, Entertainment, and Arts Alliance (MEAA) and the International Federation of Journalist (IFJ), which revealed significant issues around equal opportunity in promotion, job segregation, sexual harassment, and childcare. Following the release of the report in 1996, a total of seven recommendations were made to the industry union to “acknowledge the special problems faced by women journalists” – none were implemented.

Advertisement

Louise North, senior lecturer in journalism at Monash University and the author of the new nationwide study, found that the mainstream news media in Australia are still dominated by men at almost every level today. “Women journalists are typically located en masse in low-paid, low-status positions, struggling to attain real influence in editorial decision making roles across all media platforms,” writes North.

The problem is most pronounced at the top. As at August 2012, not one woman is entrusted with the editing role in a daily edition across the nation’s 21 metropolitan newspapers. Only three women currently edit a weekend paper.

What’s more, half of the 577 female journalists surveyed had never been promoted – even though the majority of respondents have been in their current roles for anything from 4-20 years.  

Can we trace this back purely to a boy’s club culture? Or is something else amiss here? After all, if the modern workplace is founded on a delicate ecosystem of meritocracy, then surely the most talented reporters will prevail. Why on earth wouldn’t an editor promote female journalists if they manage to keep turning out quality pieces?

The short answer, according to North’s findings, is that female reporters are less likely to be allocated the kinds of stories that make it to page one. More than half of the survey respondents (57.3 percent) agree that the more coveted news areas – such as politics and sports – tend to be assigned to male reporters, with female journalists being pigeon holed in what’s traditionally seen as lady rounds like “women’s issues, fashion, health, the arts and education.”

And since most promotions are decided on a subjective basis by editors, with little to no “formal performance review”, it’s easy to see why (male) reporters with ‘meatier rounds’ are more likely to rise through the ranks.  It’s a worrying trend – and one that is echoed globally. We only need to look at the 2012 UK study on front page bylines  (78 percent male versus 22 percent female) conducted by Women in Journalism, to get a glimpse of the gender bias in action.

The most staggering finding in North’s survey, however, is the rising problem of sexual harassment in Australian newsrooms. In fact, more Australian female journalists have experienced sexual harassment compared to 16 years ago, with 57.3 percent of all respondents having been experienced “objectionable remarks or behaviour” from a male colleague or manager in a senior position.

An overwhelming 87.2 percent of the women affected chose not to report the incidents – citing “fear of victimisation” or that “there are no benefits in doing so”. Depressingly, the survey also indicates that “majority of respondents believe sexual harassment is an accepted part of their organisation’s culture and [is] tolerated in the workplace” – and these are smart women who make a living from being vocal.  

As North points out, for an industry that “shines light on gender inequity in other occupation”,  the media has failed miserably at investigating their own gender issues.

No one is expecting to wipe out sexism in newsrooms overnight. But isn’t it time we stop turning a blind eye to the inequity faced by working women – especially those whose voices are crucial in shaping the way we see world?  

 

23 comments

  • After a few years working in a metropolitan newsroom (my first ever job), I have only just started to feel relatively comfortable.
    And by 'comfortable' I mean 'able to string a sentence together without feeling like an idiot'.

    Since starting, I have been told to get 'a makeover', change my hair and wear better (and more expensive) clothing. I have felt older males lean over my shoulder while glancing down my shirt, and have witnessed arse-slapping and inappropriate comments on a daily basis.

    And the sexism isn't just delivered by men. It is also fueled by the female elders of the newsroom; jealousy encouraging them to serve up a constant stream of abuse and insults towards youngsters like me. Somehow making themselves feel better. For the first six months of my job I stumbled home into the arms of my boyfriend a literal mess; a jaded, broken bucket of tears, while the younger men seemed to do just fine - blokey handshakes and all.

    Gradually I have come to be recognised as a valued member of the team, but even as the powers-to-be acknowledge female intelligence and dedication, I can't confidently say that I see myself inching up the ladder of power any time soon.

    Commenter
    Cadet
    Date and time
    January 29, 2013, 9:02AM
    • Why would you want to stay in a job like that?

      Commenter
      Think
      Date and time
      January 29, 2013, 9:21AM
    • Unfortunately this sort of bad behaviour is not just confined to newsrooms/publishing etc.
      Walk into most larger offices and the same thing is happening.

      Commenter
      david
      Date and time
      January 29, 2013, 10:43AM
    • good on you for sticking with it a lot of people myself included would have left long ago and bought a shrimp boat

      Commenter
      Jill
      Date and time
      January 29, 2013, 12:18PM
    • Switch to magazines. I work in the magazine industry and it's vastly dominated by women at all levels. Offices are 80 percent female. The newspaper industry is a dying old-school dinosaur. Magazines are still prospering.

      Commenter
      missminute
      Date and time
      January 29, 2013, 12:52PM
    • Missminute, those were my thoughts. I'm a journalist in the magazine industry (for property and finance publications, not a women's magazine) and I've never experienced sexism. In fact, some of the most senior and well-respected journalists at my company are women. The only times I have felt intimidated have been at events where I'm in the company of newspaper editors or bankers (who, unsurprisingly, are all middle aged men).

      Commenter
      BecD
      Date and time
      January 29, 2013, 4:16PM
  • Universities are one third of the problem. They are there to mass-produce a cohort of graduates who will end up in dead-end one-dimensional roles where their opinion means nothing. Effectively, most jobs offered by large corporations are purposely menial - designed to do one thing only and support the system that keeps them there (as willing slaves with the promise of promotion, if...), while the lucky idiot (who didn't even go to university) gets to do leaps and bounds just by saying yes when he's expected and becoming just like one of dem (old, wrinkly, sexist crooks at the top). They hate seeing what they could never be or be a part of, so they will try their best to ensure that they are right and that they have been, all along.

    Commenter
    Black Palm
    Date and time
    January 29, 2013, 9:09AM
    • So please stand by this story and name and shame those within Dailylife or Sydney Morning Herald who are doing this.
      It needs to be out in the open and those men/women need to be shamed.

      Commenter
      david
      Date and time
      January 29, 2013, 9:46AM
      • Oh David! The irony is exquisite! You consistently troll this site, stomping up and down about 'men's rights' - you have no understanding of what feminism means and, judging from your other comments, have a pathological, dangerous obsession with Clementine Ford! And now you're demanding that people name names? Mate, look in the mirror! You're a walking, talking example of harassment!

        Commenter
        Sheba
        Date and time
        January 29, 2013, 10:28AM
      • Sheba your comments are not only offensive but I believe borderline defamatory, and by my understanding breach Dailylife's own guidelines. How was your last post allowed to be aired?
        I take deep offence at being called a "troll".
        I believe I have a very clear understanding of feminism, and if you believe that critiquing others' work, including Clementine, and not always being supportive, is pathological then I worry for the course of feminism and for you.

        Commenter
        david
        Date and time
        January 29, 2013, 10:42AM

    More comments

    Comments are now closed