Why you should pity the homophobes

Video will begin in 5 seconds.

Video settings

What type of connection do you have?

Video settings form
  1. Note: A cookie will be set to keep your preferences.

Video settings

Your video format settings have been saved.

Why won't Katter answer the question?

Australia Party leader Bob Katter hung up on a radio interview after being questioned about his party's view on equal rights.

PT0M0S 620 349

When we experience a week as steeped in old-world bigotry as the one we’ve had, there’s always a huge amount of focus on the impact such statements must have on the LGBT community. The unremittingly bigoted comments made by Katter Australia Party members Tess Corbett and Bernard Gaynor will no doubt inflict pain on a group so entirely and uncontroversially undeserving of such treatment.

And this is all well and fine, but can we just once take a step back and spare a thought for the homophobes?

Because Christ almighty it must be frightening to be homophobic. I have my own issues with anxiety, so I can sympathise with the persistent and inexplicable sense of impending doom that must plague these people. But even with this insight, I can’t begin to imagine what it must be like to hold a worldview in which the gays are forever lurking in a corner, waiting for the opportunity to explode our traditional way of life in a cloud of glitter and amyl before snaffling away our kids like the Pied Piper and marching them over some kind of horrible gay cliff. Being dogged by such thoughts must be utterly exhausting.

If I truly believed in a world so fragile and a force so malignant – a force that is, crucially, becoming less stigmatised, gaining more support, approaching some kind of ‘normalisation’ – then I doubt very much that I’d have the fortitude to get out of bed in the morning, save for the driving force to paint my beliefs on a sandwich board, hit the main-street every day and grab people by the shoulders shouting ‘Don’t you see?! Why am I the only one who sees!?’.

And increasingly, I can only assume, they feel isolated, they feel the opinion of the rest of the nation slipping away from them. They sit bewildered and indignant when called to account for statements that positively slayed at the Club, circa 1980. This isn’t the Australia they grew up in – there’s an odious sway toward the politically correct, where just saying what they imagine everyone is thinking is suddenly a crime.

How do they think this is going to end?

How many more times did they think someone could tie homosexuality to paedophilia or a threat to our children before such a comment was seen as so drastically out of step with the mainstream that that person would be written off as a loon, much less a viable politician?

But these last guardians of ‘values’ and ‘family’ (and at what point, by the way, did bigots get a monopoly on those two concepts?) lash themselves to the mast in the hope that this storm will pass, in the belief that if they hold strong this fad will go away  - as though the concept of social equality was the Charleston or a Tamagotchi.  And, of course, they can tell their grandkids that ‘yes, there was a time for a few decades where queers could teach kids, but of course there was also a time where people had pet rocks!’

This is Bob Katter’s line, and one he’s been peddling for years. He’s the closest thing our nation has to a ‘celebrity homophobe’ but it’s a title he seems to believe has been foisted upon him unfairly. The interview he conducted with The Project on Thursday was a perfect example of this. He paints himself as a no-nonsense bush politician who is forever going on these shows to talk about important things, things that actually matter to folk, and is constantly bombarded with questions about inner-city issues that, if he’s honest, he doesn’t really give a lot of thought to.

He characterises issues like equality as luxury causes – causes that it must just be lovely to have the time to take up without having to worry about grown up things like, oh he doesn’t know, feeding a whole country, which you’re welcome for by the way.

Which would be an understandable enough position were it not for the fact that Bob Katter and his party clearly do give a lot of thought to gays. He can say what he wants about important issues like farmers getting destroyed by the supermarket duopoly and rural suicides, but it is undeniable that his party has been the most vocal on the issue of any this side of the CDP.

And it’s especially galling when he feels that he can say what he wants about an issue that means so much to so many and then hide behind rural suicide rates when called to account. And the rate of rural suicide is a staggering tragedy in this country, and it’s worth more than a means of deflection when asked to explain views espoused by him or his party.

And even if we accept his premise, it still doesn’t hold up. Just because you believe an issue does not affect your electorate (which it plainly does, probably more-so having someone like Katter as their representative) that’s not how being a politician - or a human being really - works. For all Katter’s sound and fury about inner city types not caring about problems affecting rural communities, he certainly seems reluctant to give two shits about something he deems (again, entirely incorrectly) to be a city-based issue.

So spare a thought for Tess Corbett and Bernard Gaynor; spare a thought for Bob Katter if you feel especially generous. As the first two pick through the wreckage of their careers and the third tries to deflect the ensuing media shitstorm, imagine their simmering rage and bewilderment as they try to work out what exactly, if anything, they did to deserve this.

Ben Jenkins is a Sydney-based writer. He blogs at abafflingordeal.com and tweets at @bencjenkins

95 comments

  • And to just add to the oddity of this story, the guys name is Bernard GAYnor and he speaks with one of those lisps people use when they're doing bad impressions of a stereotypical gay man.

    These people are what they are - xenophobic, homophobic, sexist, backward looking. And yes, they live their lives in fear of change, that's why they are called conservatives and not progressives.

    Commenter
    JDG
    Date and time
    January 25, 2013, 2:22PM
    • It is of no great surpirse that comments by Katter's Australia Party members are being made given that Gillard is making it legal to discriminate against people based on their sexual orientation..I doubt Gillard would accept discrimination against women in the same way.

      “Julia Gillard is far from being a progressive reformer because she refuses to acknowledge that the practices of religious orders are fundamentally discriminatory because it does not extend equal recognition to all Australians.

      Gillard's only interest is retaining her position as Prime Minister all other matters such as discrimniation full to the wayside when it comes down to votes.

      Leadership is a process of influencing events in a way that advances our society, and in this case Gillard should be articulating the case against discrimination. She has failed this leadership test.

      Commenter
      George
      Location
      Melbourne
      Date and time
      January 25, 2013, 3:35PM
    • If we all turn queer with each other then we wont breed any more gays. How awesome is South Park

      Commenter
      Franky
      Location
      Sydney
      Date and time
      January 25, 2013, 3:40PM
    • Franky

      EVERYONE BACK IN THE PILE!!!

      Commenter
      Mathew
      Date and time
      January 25, 2013, 4:34PM
    • I understand what you're saying but please don't suggest that those policies aren't discriminatory towards women. Women are barred from leadership roles in the church precisely because they're women, women make up the majority of administrators, carers, charitable workers and volunteers in religious organisations. Single women, single mothers and yes, lesbians are particularly at risk of losing their employment as a result of those policies.

      Commenter
      Sal
      Date and time
      January 25, 2013, 5:50PM
    • @ George,
      Whilst Gillard's efforts to legislate permissable discrimination based on religious grounds are completely at odds with whole concept of "Anti Discrimination" and are completely obnoxious. However there is no point using this as a 'sink it into Gillard' excuse to bag the government because the opposition are just as supportive of the discrimination that will be entrenched in the bill - the opposition would probably want more exemptions to discriminate.

      Commenter
      Evan
      Date and time
      January 25, 2013, 11:19PM
    • The more scary fact is that there are enough people out there who they believe will vote for them if they run on that kind of campaign.

      Commenter
      bw
      Location
      Sydney
      Date and time
      January 26, 2013, 4:21AM
    • Perversity is the pleasure of public freedoms for political aspirants ,the only ones allowed the luxury, in order to create the impression for the history books.Its all a an orchestrated sham to bolster belief in the whole show.Dont get sucked in.Emotional issues ,co ordinated disasters, and errant loud mouths , all their weapons to hide the real nasty truths behind.

      Commenter
      Kane
      Date and time
      January 26, 2013, 9:16AM
    • at the same time europe is slowly stripping the churches and religous groups of their power. its now law that religous groups cannot discriminate anymore in europe. shows what a backward thinking redneck backwater australia is and what dinosaurs we have in power - like Gillard and Abbott.

      Commenter
      smilingjack
      Date and time
      January 26, 2013, 12:10PM
  • Sadly there will always be people with bigoted attitudes but whilst I sympathise with those who have to suffer as a result of this, the real question to me is why the mainstream parties do not do more to promote acceptance and equality for the LGBT community.

    Commenter
    Hurrow
    Date and time
    January 25, 2013, 2:26PM

    More comments

    Comments are now closed