New Zealand teen sex ring 'Roast Busters' name and shame victims

Video will begin in 5 seconds.

Video settings

What type of connection do you have?

Video settings form
  1. Note: A cookie will be set to keep your preferences.

Video settings

Your video format settings have been saved.

Inquiry into ‘Roast Busters’ sex case

An independent investigation into the police handling of the ‘Roast Busters’ sex case is ordered by the New Zealand Police Minister Anne Tolley.

PT0M0S 620 349

A group of teenage boys in Auckland calling themselves the ‘Roast Busters’ have been exposed by New Zealand news network 3 News for operating what amounts to an organised rape ring of local girls, many of them underage.  

Members of the group have been using Facebook to recruit other perpetrators to their gang, the hilarious purpose of which has been to ply girls with alcohol until intoxication and then gang rape them. As if that weren’t bad enough, the ‘Roast Busters’ (and what is it with groups of sexually violent misogynists adopting childish monikers to fuel a sense of belonging and superiority?) then used that same Facebook page to name and shame their victims, many of whom were then vilified as ‘sluts’ for allowing themselves to be ‘roasted’ by a gang of entitled rapists. 

When 3 News launched the findings of its investigation, Auckland police responded half heartedly, claiming that they had known about the page since 2011 but had been ‘powerless’ to do anything about it. Whether or not that has anything to do with the page’s members (one of whom is the son of a local law enforcement officer, while another is the son of an actor) is cause for query; so far, the police have denied it. According to the police, they didn’t have enough evidence to press charges.

A screen shot of the teen boys Joseph Parker and Beraiah Hales via 3 News.

A screen shot of the teen boys Joseph Parker and Beraiah Hales via 3 News.

Apparently, publicising an admission of participation in the rape of underage drunk girls with the intent of gaining infamy and popularity isn’t enough these days. Nor is being approached by an underaged victim two years ago with allegations of rape by at least three boys. Rest assured though, the police haven’t been entirely lacklustre. They did warn members that their behaviour ‘might be verging on criminal’. Boys will be boys, and it’s just so hard to prove anything these days.

Instead, the ‘Roast Busters’ have been left to boast of their exploits online. In a video published by 3 News, ringleaders Joseph Levall Parker and Beraiah Hales brag, “We don’t choose a roast, the roast chooses us.” In a chilling display of just how little respect Parker has for his victims, he adds, “They know what we’re like; they know what they’re in for.”

NZ Greens MP and former sexual abuse counsellor Jan Logie perfectly articulates just how insidious rape culture has become with her assessment of the Auckland gang. “If you need more proof that there is something seriously wrong with how rape is talked about and prosecuted, look no further than the revelations about the Roast Busters rape club.”

Joseph Parker and Beraiah Hales

Joseph Parker and Beraiah Hales

This is what rape culture looks like, and this is why our current method of focusing on rape ‘prevention’ is failing dismally. Do we really imagine that this group is operating in isolation? We already know that similar ‘jokes’ have been played in Steubenville (where a group allegedly operated under the name ‘the Rape Crew’, Maryville, Canberra and Texas to name just a very few. Even in Auckland, investigations are currently being made into a copycat group.

The question we should be consumed with answering is not how we can educate young girls to be more proactive about avoiding rape, but how we can educate young boys to understand that they are not entitled to the bodies of other people just because they demand them, nor are they entitled to humiliate those same people in order to peacock for their mates. These girls weren’t raped because they drank too much and put themselves in the path of predators; they were raped because masculine entitlement still runs so deep that a group of teenage boys thought it would be a funny thing to do, while high fiving each other over their intoxicated victim’s body.

Rape is an action that’s directly perpetrated, increasingly so as part of a group bonding exercise. But rape culture positions rape as an arbitrary accident girls stumble into when they’ve failed to take the proper precautions against it. Shifting the onus on girls to protect themselves enables perpetrators to continue unabated, content in the knowledge that there will never be any real consequences for their actions. Instead, we are asked to consider their good childhoods and their promising futures - as if choosing to participate in the ritualised group humiliation and sexual violation of another human being is simply a hiccup in the journey to becoming a decent person.

Unfortunately, it is easier to accept that the women you love might are potential victims who need to be protected than it is to understand the men you love might be potential predators who need to be stopped.

As an anonymous member of the Roast Busters wrote in a Facebook ‘nonpology’, “All of the girls that have been effected [sic] by this whole ridiculousness I apologize and wish the best for you.”

Rape culture is reflecting on the exposure of the organised activities of a gang of rapists (some of whom have not yet reached 18) as ‘this whole ridiculousness’, as if what happened was a simple misunderstanding that could be cleared up by a few conciliatory statements and the reassurance that at least one of these men has ‘taken this as a massive learning experience’. I’m so glad that the victimisation of girls and women has been yet again justified by the learning curve of a man.

Then there are those words again. They know what they’re in for. I recall a similar excuse being made by members of the public back in 2009 when Four Corners broke the story of Cronulla Sharks' group sex scandal in New Zealand; it is invoked again whenever a young woman brings allegations of rape against a high profile sporting identity, or a young girl finds herself pilloried by the public for not understanding that kissing, or clothing, or going home with someone all contribute to a promise that needs to be fulfilled.

And this is rape culture too. The expectation that ‘consent’, as flimsily secured as it might be, is an excuse for men to behave with impunity; to exercise all the most disgusting, degrading attitudes that they might hold towards women either for their own satisfaction or for approval of friends looking on. That a ‘yes’, however shakily it might be offered or assumed, is a contract signed by a woman that surrenders her right not just to dignity and respect, but to complaint when it turns out she was there as a prop not a participant.

This is the environment in which rape culture flourishes.

It is how ‘good’ boys and men go on to commit sexual crimes against the women they’ve been trained not to view as equal human beings, and to then be excused for them with little more than a slap on the wrist and an entreaty to be smarter next time. It is how a group of non-descript lads in Auckland can form a rape club called the ‘Roast Busters’ and brag about it online, believing implicitly in their right to do so as both lords and masters of their own domain.

And it is why these groups will continue to flourish like a poisonous fungus across a society that chooses not to see what’s really going on.

105 comments

  • A great article, so well articulated and argued. This should be a compulsory discussion article in all schools. No hysteria, just plain facts and well argued rationale. Well done.

    Commenter
    Hamelot
    Location
    Victoria
    Date and time
    November 07, 2013, 10:57AM
    • Totally agree.

      Commenter
      vintageyahtzee
      Date and time
      November 07, 2013, 11:57AM
    • Except for the whole bit about the police not having enough evidence to be charged.

      Obviously you, I and Clementine Ford can sit here in our armchairs saying "oh these guys are terrible and should definitely go to jail for their horrendous crimes", but the law doesn't work like that.

      If the police say they don't have the evidence to obtain a conviction, it's because they don't have enough evidence to obtain a conviction. They know this because they have referred the matter to a prosecutor, who has told them straight "this is not enough to convince a jury, beyond reasonable doubt".

      I don't know why it's so hard to understand, this is the problem with rape case and why they don't get convictions - not because the justice system doesn't want to prosecute, but because juries must have enough evidence to convict.

      Commenter
      Christian
      Date and time
      November 07, 2013, 12:10PM
    • Except, Christian, that they haven't referred it to the prosecutor. Although a number of girls did go to the police, formal investigations were never begun.

      Commenter
      pb
      Location
      sydney
      Date and time
      November 07, 2013, 1:45PM
    • Actually Christian, a close family member of mine is a cop and it really depends on the detective looking after a job. You'd think that people in that line of work would have a strong commitment to seeing justice done and helping people, but there are plenty who are just plain lazy and won't bother charging someone because there "wasn't enough evidence". When really there would have been enough evidence, if only they'd bothered to go and retrieve surveillance footage or interview a witness etc.

      Commenter
      Girl
      Date and time
      November 07, 2013, 2:00PM
    • When I was a detective I was taught that an admission is a great start to an investigation - for the police to do nothing is a disgrace - it sounds like the evidence has been kept by these filthy criminals - seize their computers and phones - get statements then lock them up like the ones in Sydney who got 40 odd years.

      Commenter
      the Truth
      Location
      Melbourne
      Date and time
      November 07, 2013, 2:02PM
    • Yes, Christian, I'm sure the Police failing to act had everything to do with a simple lack of evidence, and nothing to do with the fact that one of these boys is a cop's son, and another the son of a Hollywood actor.

      Commenter
      jack
      Date and time
      November 07, 2013, 2:19PM
    • Christian,

      A senior NZ policeman has also said that the victims are not "brave enough" to come forward.
      (http://www.news.com.au/world/breaking-news/inquiry-on-handling-of-roast-busters-case/story-e6frfkui-1226754755959).

      The entire situation stinks to high heaven and is characteristic of the fact that the onus is still placed on victims not only to prevent the crimes committed against them, but to prove them. No mean feat in a climate where it's still routinely alleged that rape victims were just negligent sluts who don't really understand what rape is.

      Commenter
      Red Pony
      Date and time
      November 07, 2013, 2:23PM
    • @Christian what is so hard to understand is that "publicising an admission of participation", is as you suggest not sufficient evidence

      Commenter
      atombomb
      Date and time
      November 07, 2013, 2:33PM
  • Regrettably I recently had occasion to bring to a teacher's notice a post on a 12 year old boy's instagram - he had a picture of his friend - another boy, hat on sideways, pulling a goofy face - "Watch out for [FRIEND'S NAME] he's a rapist..."

    I'm so concerned that in this 'virtual' world morals are more than confused in fraught attempts to be noticed, the desperation to be 'liked' overriding everything and anything.

    In real life this 12 year old boy is a quiet little chap with a cheeky sense of humour. I really hope that the class discussion that followed the alert to his post helped to stave off escalation to the extent above.

    Commenter
    pohm_de_terre
    Date and time
    November 07, 2013, 11:08AM

    More comments

    Comments are now closed